On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 04:23:26PM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > I was only concerned about this part of your statement: > > > The rest of > > us, as far as I can tell, think that giving a user a script that makes it > > easier to compile a certain binary does not equate to distribution of the > > same binary. > > If the binary did infringe, the script might well contribute.
But I'm not sure how a binary can infringe on its own. > one reason why we handle DJB's works with such care (see > daemontools-installer). I'm not sure if you used this as an example because you know that I'm the maintainer of that package, but yes, I am well aware of this issue. --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]