On Thu, Dec 03, 1998 at 12:24:06 -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > I'm surprised by this paragraph -- either it's very obviously wrong or > I'm completely missing your point. I'll try responding based on what > I understand you to be saying: > > Of course we're encouraging people to use the stuff we put on our sites. > In most cases that's not a problem.
Why is it a problem in the case of KDE source? The conflict between KDE's and Qt's license only affects the /distribution/ of /binaries/. I can't see what would be wrong in making it easier for our users to build KDE binaries themselves. If we were actively encouraging our users to distribute such binaries, that could (in my layman's view) be viewed as contributory infringement, but we wouldn't do that. (It's easy for us to attach a clear note to the build process a user will run to point them to the problems involved in redistributing the binaries generated). Ray -- UNFAIR Term applied to advantages enjoyed by other people which we tried to cheat them out of and didn't manage. See also DISHONESTY, SNEAKY, UNDERHAND and JUST LUCKY I GUESS. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan
