Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > KDE can only be redistributed by Debian if Qt is distributable under the > GPL, or if Qt is `normally distributed with the major components' of > Debian. The thread up until now has been bickering about just what that > means in Debian's context -- we've never really thought about that clause > before. [0] ... > [0] For example, we distribute GPLed binaries linked against Motif. We > do this because Sun has. Maybe we shouldn't. Maybe Qt is the same, > and we shouldn't do that either. But then, if Qt's DFSG free (which > it will be as of v2, by the looks of things), maybe we should add > Qt support, and dump Motif support. Or maybe not.
Excuse me? Which binaries are you refering to? I thought we'd gone over this months ago and that all such binaries had been pulled or replaced with binaries linked against Lesstif. -- Raul
