John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It pretty vague license, but it would be free beacause of this:
> MusiXTeX may be included in further commercial packages, provided that no > fee is charged for MusiXTeX itself. It sure would seem to violate the license if I paid someone for monitoring the Debian archive and send me .debs when new versions of MusiXTeX were uploaded, wouldn't it? Hm, double-cheching with the DFSG, it seems that this restriction *is* actually considered free. Is this intentional? Ok, so my agent would have to include, e.g., hello_n.n-n.n.deb on each of the disks they send me, to avoid charging for a program that must not cost anything when distributed alone. This seems silly. -- Henning Makholm
