John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Henning Makholm writes: > > Hm, double-cheching with the DFSG, it seems that this restriction *is* > > actually considered free. Is this intentional?
> It's there to let the Artistic in. I thought that the Artistic was let in by the fact that if I sell a copy of perl I get to decide myself if the price I take is fair enough to be allowed by the licence? -- Henning Makholm
