On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 03:29:03PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Chris Lawrence wrote: > > It highly inconveniences our users, however. No part of the Social > > Contract says "protesting stupid laws is more important than our users." > > How does it inconvencience our users?
a) None looks for mailing program with no encription in non-us b) there is often no non-us on cds c) this damages users' brains and having damaged brain is inconvencient (at laest for me) > > It also inconveniences the Debian maintainer, who has to maintain two > > different forks of the same code (source and binary). It wastes space > > on our mirrors. It creates confusion by having multiple packages that > > do the exact same thing (less a system() or two). > > What are you talking about? Both source and binary would go in non-US. Stop this thread now !!! There is no strong nor any other encription in mutt. If you think EVERY program calling pgp/gpg have to go to non-us then what is contrib for ??? And mutt can work without pgp/gpg so it doesnt belong to contrib.
