> I don't rule out someone distributing software licensed with the > current license as part of non-free; if a maintainer wants to jump > through whatever hoops are required, they are free to do so. I > think if you got rid of the requirement to resubmit patches, there > would be a better chance of a debian developer picking up the non- > free package.
The license says you can just provide AT&T with a URL. Is that http://www.debian.org/distrib/something? Should we considered AT&T notified? End of discussion? I don't want to nitpick, but isn't that the very essence of this process :-)
