On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:34:25PM -0500, Stephen C. North wrote: > > I don't rule out someone distributing software licensed with the > > current license as part of non-free; if a maintainer wants to jump > > through whatever hoops are required, they are free to do so. I > > think if you got rid of the requirement to resubmit patches, there > > would be a better chance of a debian developer picking up the non- > > free package. > > The license says you can just provide AT&T with a URL. > Is that http://www.debian.org/distrib/something? > Should we considered AT&T notified? > End of discussion? > > I don't want to nitpick, but isn't that the very essence of this process :-)
As I said, if that's the only issue to worry about, it could go in non-free. It sounds like you want it in main though, not non-free. The requirements are completely different. -- Elie Rosenblum That is not dead which can eternal lie, http://www.cosanostra.net And with strange aeons even death may die. Admin / Mercenary / System Programmer - _The Necronomicon_
