John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You're right, but this is also precedent setting: the first time that a > choice of law of a state where UCITA is in effect (it took effect 7/1) has > been used in an otherwise free license that was submitted as a candidate > to d-l. This may take some time to work out.
I don't see why. Feel free to do research; if you turn up something curious, we can ask a lawyer. But still, that's no reason to delay just because of FUD. Indeed, it might be better to just ask Eben Moglen directly.
