Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am of the opinion that not explicitly talking about inclusive and > exclusive exceptions in my proposal was an omission that should not have > been made. You can be sure that I will address that issue in the next > version of my proposal, if it isn't rendered irrelevant by an > alternative amendment (see my discussions with Henning Makholm and > Thomas Uwe Gruetmueller).
Great! What I'd like to see is some kind of idea about how exactly these exceptions are to be made, and by whom.
