Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:08:25PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > > I'd argue that the disclaimer only matters if the person posted the > > content to the list themselves rather than have it forwarded and even > > then possibly only if they knew it was a list. > > > > I believe Thomas had an excellent explanation of what to do in this > > situation. > > I'm opposed to us practicing Stalinistic revisionism on our list > archives.
Yes, that's a good point. So if they insist on removal of the messages (which they have not done at this point), we can replace them with a paraphrase, include a notation that we have done so, and why, and a pointer to the present thread, and make damn sure we keep all their email addresses fully visible. > If party X posts information on our mailing lists that party Y didn't > want the world to see, party Y's beef is with party X, not us. Indeed, but alas, copyright law allows party Y to sue us too.
