Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm almost certain we'd do so. But we'd do it in such a way as to make > the person who asked it sorry they'd ever bothered. This would begin with > putting equally-offensive information that is NOT copyrighted in place of > the alleged copyright violation. Even so, we'll probably be unable to act > quickly enough to prevent sites more popular than ours > (*cough*slashdot*cough*) from distributing the content very widely if they > so choose. When the topic comes up, all this will be gleefully pointed > out to our putative claimant.
Yes, this is basically my plan. But thanks for fleshing out the details even better than I had.
