Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've no doubt. Still, where in the DFSG does it say that you can have > unlicensed software (even if it's public-domain) in Debian?
It doesn't need to. > I'm not trying to be obstreperous, or cause trouble. I'm trying to > point out that you're applying the DFSG in an arbitrary manner. We > can't do that at OSI, so we need the OSD to cover these cases. If > there is to be one document describing free and open software, it has > to cover those cases. You may not have understood how the DFSG is applied, but we have been remarkably consistent about it.
