On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:35, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 05:07:13PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > > Distribution does not, and has never, mattered (see previous message in > > this thread). > > I think it's pretty clear that all three subsections of section 2 takes no > effect unless distribution has occured.
Please read it again -- if that's so, why does (2)(b) specifically mention distribution? (2)(a) and (2)(c) *do* apply even in the absence of distribution. -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson