Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes: > > It is my opinion, on first read-through, that this version would > satisfy the DFSG. I hope others will agree.
Branden Robinson writes: > At first glance this looks really good, and probably satisfies the > DFSG. I would appreciate if others (I think remember Walter and Mark) had some concerns with the last version would take a look too. It is my believe that we resolved all issues that have been raised, but after a year of work and perhaps 1500 emails in total it would be nice if the result gets a clear voting in the end. Branden continued: > While reading over it I noticed some places where the wording > could be tweaked or tightened up (I even found a possible loophole the > LaTeX folks might want to close), but I'll defer that for a much closer > reading. it would be nice to get your suggestions and comments for wordings. I intend to make the license change status by next month since then there will be a new release of LaTeX. > Thanks a lot; I greatly appreciate your patience and that of Frank > Mittelbach and numerous others in the LaTeX Project. well, it wasn't that easy --- perhaps we all learned from it. My thanks go formost to Jeff and additionally to everybody else who contributed in a constructive way. best frank
