Sergey Spiridonov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter S Galbraith wrote: > > >>I still wonder why people with the same ardour and consistency do not speak > >>about distribution of software in the non-free section? Why Debian > >>distributes non-free? > > Don't knock it! We might need it soon to hold all the GFDL manuals. > > It's interesting that people who want Debian to move FDL to non-free at the > same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff. > > Is it accidental?
Well you want to distribute non-free stuff in main, which to me is far worse. At least I don't want to mis-represent non-free stuff as free. I want it plainly labelled as non-free. (And I won't care that much if we kill non-free anyway, even with FSF manuals in it. We'll get them someplace else.)
