Adam Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > [message BCCed to aj] > > I wanted you all to be aware how Sarge is treating Documentation and the > DFSG: <http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt> > > Documentation in main and contrib must be freely distributable, > and wherever possible should be under a DFSG-free license. This > will likely become a requirement post-sarge.
Why can't the offending packages just be moved to non-free? It isn't like there hasn't been enough warning. > Given the aggressive (and endearingly optimistic) timetable of releasing > Sarge this December[0!] I support this pragmatic decision. Pragmatism is not the defining principle of the DFSG. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
