Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adam Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > [message BCCed to aj] > > > > I wanted you all to be aware how Sarge is treating Documentation and the > > DFSG: <http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt> > > > > Documentation in main and contrib must be freely distributable, > > and wherever possible should be under a DFSG-free license. This > > will likely become a requirement post-sarge. > > Why can't the offending packages just be moved to non-free? It isn't > like there hasn't been enough warning.
I would guess that's because we haven't committed to a decision yet. :-( > > Given the aggressive (and endearingly optimistic) timetable of releasing > > Sarge this December[0!] I support this pragmatic decision. > > Pragmatism is not the defining principle of the DFSG. With you 100%. Peter
