On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:07:41AM -0400, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > Oh, I certainly disagree with you, but that wasn't my point -- others > are doing a fine job of making that argument. But if I did agree with > you, can you imagine the flame wars that would result if we had to > decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not Debian could permit > and/or support various invariant screeds? I have a feeling l.d.o > would simply explode!
It could be argued that deciding, on a case by case basis, which items of
invariant speech were acceptable based on subject or statements could be
viewed as making a statement of non-technical policy, and subject to GR
approval. Per item.
Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?
--
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter : :' :
`. `'
`-
pgpylCYqt559h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
