Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Pointless. I think it's pointless to provide a freedom which already > > given and cannot be removed. > > Do you think we already have the right to modify invariant text in the > GFDL?
Yes I do. I can rewrite any idea expressed in any text, invariant or not. (I cannot rewrite any idea behind a software until I get access to the sources. If I don't, it's only mimetism.) > My only point is that the analogy between books (which may or may > not be free, depending on their license) and works under the GFDL is > fundamentally flawed. But apparently you missed the fact that works under the GFDL possibly can be edited as book. -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english