> If they can't modify it freely, and can't put it on their encrypted > filesystem, we feel it is not suitable for them. > > > Not to mention the fact that many contributors to Debian (translators > > for instance) are not considered officially as Debian developers, > > which makes Debian voting system awkward, especially about > > documentation. > > There hasn't been any general vote for that, there is probably no need > for it.
Sure, you claim to be "we" including all Debian developers. > Readers of this list (not only developers) have stated their strong > belief that the GFDL does not follow the DFSG. I'm a reader of this list and I'm pretty sure I never stated such belief. Am I the only one? > > So even a Debian developers's vote is probably not enough to make that > > decision. Sure, normally Debian developers *should* understand what is > > the best for Debian users but from what I rode on that list, it's not > > sure at all for several of them. > > I believe the FSF is not in a situation where they can talk about the > best for our users, Does someone spoke for the FSF here? I do not think so. This sentence is completely off-topic, we are not speaking about what the FSF may think. -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english