* Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030909 11:20]: > And it leads me to another question for the list: when thinking about > the GFDL, the answer from the list is 'the GFDL is not > DFSG-compliant', but should we consider that GFDLed documentation is > equal to non-free software, by disregarding the license itself which > provide freedoms that no non-free software provides? It's a bit
Sorry, but there is certainly non-free software that provide freedom equally to GFDL. Should we consider to put this code also in main? I say "no" to this. If something is not DFSG-free thant it can not be put into main. [Footnote: I do accept an adequate timeframe for removal, but that's just a: "Handle everything with care." It doesn't change that it must be removed in long term.] Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
