* Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030909 13:50]: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > * Mathieu Roy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030909 11:20]: > > > And it leads me to another question for the list: when thinking about > > > the GFDL, the answer from the list is 'the GFDL is not > > > DFSG-compliant', but should we consider that GFDLed documentation is > > > equal to non-free software, by disregarding the license itself which > > > provide freedoms that no non-free software provides? It's a bit
> > Sorry, but there is certainly non-free software that provide freedom > > equally to GFDL. > Name one. qmail. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
