On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:55:52 -0300 Carlos Laviola wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:39:56 +0200, Francesco Poli > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:00:28 -0300 Carlos Laviola wrote: > > > Maybe > > > when Christiaan, the current FIGlet maintainer, comes back from > > > vacation and release a new version with the license changes, > > > > Which license changes? To Academic Free License 2.1? > > If this is the case, I hope he changes his mind... > > Yes, to the AFL. He might even have a different point of view, but > he's just figlet's current maintainer; copyright still belongs to the > individuals that developed figlet in the past -- which is why I'm > seeking their consent.
I really hope you can persuade all the copyright holders to relicense in
a DFSG-compliant way! :)
[...]
> > Worse: there are possibly undistributable files and this means the
> > package is perhaps not even suitable for the non-free section, until
> > you obtain clarification from relevant copyright holders...
>
> The files you refer to -- zipio.[ch], inflate.[ch], crc.[ch] were all
> written by Ed Hamrick, which has agreed to put them on the public
> domain.
No, those files were non-free, but not undistributable, IIUC.
I was rather referring to some font files (fonts/*.flf):
| Permission is hereby given to modify this font, as long as the
| modifier's name is placed on a comment line.
No permission to distribute...
[...]
> > are you saying that many
> > FIGlet copyright holders are willing to let FIGlet be free software?
> > This would be great news...
>
> Indeed, but what we think is free software is not what everyone else
> does. Even the FSF, as we all know from the troubled GFDL.
Sad but true. :-(
Anyway the good will to release free software, even with a confused idea
of free software or simply with one we don't agree on, is better than
nothing. It's something we can start from... and hope for the best!
[...]
> As a matter of fact, I had taken maintainership of figlet less than
> two weeks ago, and your bug report came in 2 days after that, but
(:-#
I've always been a well-known ball breaker, and this is the most
apparent proof... ;-)
> they've been cooperative up until this dead end.
Good news: I hope we can come up with a solution, since FIGlet is really
cool!
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp3TBSfmjqVj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
