On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 02:53:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > that you call your license by another name and do not include the GPL > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > preamble, and provided you modify the instructions-for-use at the end enough > ^^^^^^^^ > to make it clearly different in wording and not mention GNU (though the > actual procedure you describe may be similar). " > > This preamble is very close to the GPL preamble; it's clearly a derivative > work, since entire sentences are the same, others are only slightly > changed, and the structure is identical. So it doesn't really satisfy the > requirements given here. :-(
Did you not read the rest of the thread before replying? :) -- Glenn Maynard
