Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 02:53:24PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> that you call your license by another name and do not include the GPL >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> preamble, and provided you modify the instructions-for-use at the end >> enough ^^^^^^^^ >> to make it clearly different in wording and not mention GNU (though the >> actual procedure you describe may be similar). " >> >> This preamble is very close to the GPL preamble; it's clearly a >> derivative work, since entire sentences are the same, others are only >> slightly >> changed, and the structure is identical. So it doesn't really satisfy >> the >> requirements given here. :-( > > Did you not read the rest of the thread before replying? :) Eh, sometimes I read, or receive, badly out of order. Sorry. :-(
-- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
