Josh Triplett wrote: > Nathanael Nerode wrote: >> Evan Prodromou wrote: >>>Like, we wouldn't let a new word-processor into main without at >>>least one Free document in the word processor's format, >> >> Except that in this case, new documents could be created with the word >> processor, so it would work without the document. >> >> In contrast, a man page viewer would not be free unless there was at >> least one free man page, because without a man page it "wouldn't work". > > s/would not be free/would depend on non-free man pages/ . The man page > viewer would go to contrib, not non-free, as long as the license was > DFSG-free. > > - Josh Triplett
Thanks for the correction; slip of the brain. That is, of course, what I meant! -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
