Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > DFSG 3 was intended to forbid licensors from placing themselves in a > specially advantaged position. If not, why doesn't DSFG 3 simply say: > > The license must allow modifications and derived works. > > ...hmm?
Perhaps DFSG 3 is looking at it from the point of view of the receiver of the modified work rather than the modifer: A creates a QPL work, B modifies it and gives the modified version to C. Then C gets the modified work under the same licence as the original work was distributed. However, if you really want to know how DFSG 3 was intended then you must talk to the people who wrote it.
