Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This idea is a variation on "You may not use this software for > military applications" and goes against DFSG#5/#6. They're both > intrinsically non-free, no matter how laudable you may consider them > to be.
Why is discrimination against people who want to sue you significantly different to discrimination against people who want to distribute binaries without source? Neither prevents or restricts use, modification or distribution of modified works. > You cannot use a license to enforce your political position. Why is copyleft other than the use of copyright to enforce a political position (ie, that the source should always be available to people with binaries)? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
