On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 03:00:53PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > I am not sure why some people think the latter is acceptable, since it > is similar in spirit and effect to the MS EULA (which says that you > can't do anything the copyright holder doesn't like).
If so, then the GPL is, too--the copyright holder "doesn't like" you distributing binaries without source. Stop making ludicrous comparisons. > Free software licenses give things to the licensee. Not the copyright > holder. ... commence an action, including a cross-claim or counterclaim, against Licensor or any licensee alleging that the Original Work infringes a patent. Please not "or any licensee". This clause is not giving the licensee special treatment. -- Glenn Maynard
