On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > > 4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code > > [..] The license may require derived works to carry a different name or > > version number from the original software. [..] > > ===== > > > > I didn't looked at the rest of the license, but I don't think this point > > renders xdebug non-free. > > This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called > "Brian's Xdebug" or "Xdebug manual" or even "A third-party manual for > Xdebug".
The manual is no problem, that's not a derived product. Packaging for any kind of distribution is also no problem, as there is no derived product involved. > Excluding a singleton name is fine. I'd even go so far as to say any > excluding any countable set is fine. Excluding an uncountable class of > names is not. It's just one class of names, the class that has "Xdebug" in the name. Derick -- Xdebug | http://xdebug.org | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
