On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:44:05AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 15 September 2005 23:53, Francesco Poli wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:11:03 -0400 David Nusinow wrote: > > > Furthermore, we are not imposing anything on our users. They are free > > > to not install such software if they choose. We can't completely > > > protect people from being sued to begin with. > > > > C'mon David! :-( > > > > "We are not imposing anything on our users. They are free to > > not install Acrobat Reader if they choose. Consequently Acrobat > > Reader can be moved to main." > > > > This is nonsense... :-( > > Right ! Also count that mirror operators carring such software could find > themselves in a baseless lawsuit adventure while being located or not in some > exotic jurisdictions. If they manage to filter such crap somehow, then > ftpmasters could serve as last resort being targeted for no good reasons.
Do any of these choice of venue clauses impinge on simple redistribution? If so, I'd *definitely* be against those specific ones. If they don't relate to the simple redistribution that our mirror operators do, then I don't think this is an issue we have to worry about. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
