On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:53:56PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote: > Please go back and read the rest of this thread, since your arguments > were previously made and countered. You argue that since choice of > venue is a small (or putatively reasonable) cost or form of > discrimination, it can be ignored; the DFSG do not allow that.
It's not a cost, it's a risk. There are plenty of other risks that we take when we distribute software, that we consider acceptable. What makes this one unacceptable? As far as discrimination, it's only a form of discrimination insofar as the ability to sue discriminates against those for whom defending themselves will be a financial hardship. This is a problem with the law, not the license. --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
