Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As others have said before, this mostly boils down to a convenience factor. > This clause makes the venue convenient for the copyright holder in matters > of enforcement, as opposed to making it convenient for the (suspected) > copyright violator. That's ok with me.
It makes it convenient for *one* copyright holder, maybe, depending whether the legal systems actually consider choice of venue clauses. It makes it inconvenient for users and debian-legal, needing to know local absurdities of Seaforth or whereever's court procedures. Does anyone know how Berlin's courts treat choice-of-venue clauses? By the way, are all choice-of-venue licences incompatible with each other, even CDDL and CDDL-star? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
