Marco d'Itri writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>>>Is a license that requires micropayments in exchange for distribution rights >>>>free? If not, why is a cost measured in terms of legal risk imposed by the >>>>license more free than one measured in hundredths of a cent? >>> Because it's not obviously a "cost". >>I have already explained why it *is* a cost. Choice of venue is a > And many people explained why the do not believe it is, at least in the > meaning used by the DFSG.
How do you distinguish a requirement that the user abide by some remote court's process from a requirement that the user pet a cat, volunteer for some personally distasteful organization, etc? Are those DFSG-free requirements? Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
