Scripsit Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marco d'Itri writes:
>> Sure, but the DFSG is not about a license being good or bad. There are
>> plenty of "bad" licenses which are free.
> Only for a strange definition of "free" (such that some might accuse
> you of wanting to put non-free things into main).
Licenses with patch clauses are widely considered "bad" even though
they are explicitly free according to the DFSG.
--
Henning Makholm "... not one has been remembered from the time
when the author studied freshman physics. Quite the
contrary: he merely remembers that such and such is true, and to
explain it he invents a demonstration at the moment it is needed."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
