Hi, is this clause a problem? * Copyright (C) 1994-1999 RSA Security Inc. Licence to copy this document * is granted provided that it is identified as "RSA Security In.c Public-Key * Cryptography Standards (PKCS)" in all material mentioning or referencing * this document.
this is a from a header file for the pkcs#11 API standard. the original license for those header files was already discussed in the "Question about RSA license" thread. But somehow mozilla managed to get header files under LGPL/MPL/GPL license, except for above addition. I wonder: does this restriction cause any problem regarding DFSG compilance? Does it cause incompatibilities with GPL'ed applications? Also: do you think we should contact rsa labs and ask about dropping that restriction? I guess it is similar to the bsd advertising clause. Thanks for your review. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
