debian-legal  

Messages by Thread

• Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Ilya Orlov
  • Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Xavier
  • Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Ilya Orlov
  • Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Icons for proprietary software in contrib package Ilya Orlov
• Non-DFSG license in build files Moshe Piekarski
  • Re: Non-DFSG license in build files Santiago Vila
• License conditions for a specific file in praat Rafael Laboissière
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Michael Stehmann
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Michael Stehmann
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Soren Stoutner
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Rafael Laboissière
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Sam Hartman
  • Re: License conditions for a specific file in praat Simon McVittie
• GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Carl Keinath
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Soren Stoutner
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Luke Faraone
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Mechtilde Stehmann
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Simon McVittie
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Michael Stehmann
  • Re: GPL-3+ licensed test fixture (SVG/metadata) in BSD-3 project Soren Stoutner
• ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Sakirnth Nagarasa
  • Re: ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Soren Stoutner
  • Re: ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Sakirnth Nagarasa
  • ansible-runner: guidance requested on possible Apache-2.0/GPL-3.0 incompatibility Sakirnth Nagarasa
• Age Verification Shaugn Nell
  • Re: Age Verification Adenix NPSP
  • Re: Age Verification Vincent F. Heuser Jr.
  • Re: Age Verification Adenix NPSP
  • Re: Age Verification Jamie Null
  • Re: Age Verification Adenix NPSP
  • Re: Age Verification Joerg Jaspert
• On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states FloofyWolf
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Personal (disroot.org)
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Marco Trevisan
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Marco Trevisan
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Jamie Null
  • Fwd: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Lee
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the need for a censorship API for legal compliance reasons in some countries and U.S. states Adenix NPSP
• On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Vincent F. Heuser Jr.
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Vincent F. Heuser Jr.
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jamie Null
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Marcia Wilbur
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Vincent F. Heuser Jr.
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Danielle Foré
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states David Edmundson
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Stephan Verbücheln
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Heinrich Schuchardt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aigars Mahinovs
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Moritz Schlarb
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jean-Baptiste Lallement
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Soren Stoutner
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jeremy Soller
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Lucas Holt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Artur Manuel
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jeremy Soller
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Jamie Null
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Otto Kekäläinen
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Pierre-Elliott Bécue
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Bastian Blank
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Gunnar Wolf
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Toni Mueller
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Aaron Rainbolt
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Christopher Warner
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP
  • Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Vincent F. Heuser Jr.
  • Re: Re: On the unfortunate need for an "age verification" API for legal compliance reasons in some U.S. states Adenix NPSP
• Distribution of CDDL binaries in contrib Jarl Gullberg
  • Re: Distribution of CDDL binaries in contrib Bastian Blank
• Software implementing patented techniques Andrius Merkys
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon McVittie
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Andrius Merkys
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Don Armstrong
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Don Armstrong
  • Re: Software implementing patented techniques Simon Josefsson
• SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Charles Plessy
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Sune Vuorela
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Dave Crossland
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Gioele Barabucci
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Nicholas D Steeves
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Soren Stoutner
  • Re: SIL OFL 1.1 plus "reserved font name" is DFSG? Changwoo Ryu
• BSD-4-clause with different development organizations Peter Wienemann
  • Re: BSD-4-clause with different development organizations Soren Stoutner
  • Re: BSD-4-clause with different development organizations Simon Josefsson
• RE Kristalina Georgieva
• Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Fabio Fantoni
  • Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Francesco Poli
  • Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Fabio Fantoni
  • Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Fabio Fantoni
  • Re: Question about icons related to a trademark in a package Soren Stoutner
• no licenses are granted + BSD-3-clause Jérémy Lal
  • Re: no licenses are granted + BSD-3-clause Soren Stoutner
  • Re: no licenses are granted + BSD-3-clause Jérémy Lal
  • Re: no licenses are granted + BSD-3-clause Daniel Hakimi
• Logo copyright infringement Cato Nilsen
• SF logo + CC0 license (upcoming octave-gnerate-html package) Rafael Laboissière
  • Re: SF logo + CC0 license (upcoming octave-gnerate-html package) John Scott
  • Re: SF logo + CC0 license (upcoming octave-gnerate-html package) Rafael Laboissière
• How to handle copyright notices in testdata intended for license validation tools? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: How to handle copyright notices in testdata intended for license validation tools? Richard Laager
  • Re: How to handle copyright notices in testdata intended for license validation tools? Simon Josefsson
  • Re: How to handle copyright notices in testdata intended for license validation tools? Soren Stoutner
• Fw: Re: VVVVVV - Seeking Sponsorship computermouth
  • Re: Fw: Re: VVVVVV - Seeking Sponsorship Mihai Moldovan
  • Re: Fw: Re: VVVVVV - Seeking Sponsorship Walter Landry
  • Re: Fw: Re: VVVVVV - Seeking Sponsorship computermouth
• HIPPOCRATIC LICENSE Simon Josefsson
  • Re: HIPPOCRATIC LICENSE David Given
  • Re: HIPPOCRATIC LICENSE Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: HIPPOCRATIC LICENSE Henrik Ahlgren
  • Re: HIPPOCRATIC LICENSE Joerg Jaspert
  • Re: HIPPOCRATIC LICENSE Simon Josefsson
• Seeking advice on DFSG compatibility of MIT license plus custom attribution requirement Boyuan Yang
  • Re: Seeking advice on DFSG compatibility of MIT license plus custom attribution requirement Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Seeking advice on DFSG compatibility of MIT license plus custom attribution requirement John Scott
  • Re: Seeking advice on DFSG compatibility of MIT license plus custom attribution requirement Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Seeking advice on DFSG compatibility of MIT license plus custom attribution requirement Francesco Poli
  • Re: Seeking advice on DFSG compatibility of MIT license plus custom attribution requirement Soren Stoutner
• GPLv2 compliance for third-party Docker images. Charles Plessy
  • Re: GPLv2 compliance for third-party Docker images. Francesco Poli
  • Re: GPLv2 compliance for third-party Docker images. Charles Plessy
• Re: Re: conquer relicensing Juan Mendez
• BSD-2-Clause with 'in this position and unchanged' addition? libarchive Simon Josefsson
  • Re: BSD-2-Clause with 'in this position and unchanged' addition? libarchive Soren Stoutner
  • Re: BSD-2-Clause with 'in this position and unchanged' addition? libarchive Daniel Hakimi
  • Re: BSD-2-Clause with 'in this position and unchanged' addition? libarchive Soren Stoutner
• Copyright of console illustrations Andrea Pappacoda
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Tobias Frost
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Francesco Poli
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Simon Josefsson
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Henrik Ahlgren
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations David Given
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Andrew M.A. Cater
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Michael Lustfield
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations John Scott
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Andrea Pappacoda
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Soren Stoutner
  • Re: Copyright of console illustrations Michael Lustfield
• Re: Re: is it allowed to deny access to obsolete GPL2 source packages? Pete P
• Ok veamos si lo aceptan o no Arturo Duarte
• Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license Aryan Karamtoth
  • Re: Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license Maytham Alsudany
  • Re: Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license Aryan Karamtoth
  • Re: Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license Luke W Faraone
  • Re: Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license Aryan Karamtoth
  • Re: Need advice: Package has a restrictive non-free modified MIT license Aryan Karamtoth
• chats Mya Htwe
  • chats Mya Htwe
• mingw-w64: Vague permission grant for embedded Cephes math lib mappu
• Ray wrestlingang186
• dkopp license and copyright issue Michael Cornelison
  • Re: Bug#987089: dkopp license and copyright issue 肖盛文
  • Re: dkopp license and copyright issue Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#987089: dkopp license and copyright issue debian-legal
  • Re: dkopp license and copyright issue Michael Cornelison
• dkopp package copyright and license text Michael Cornelison
  • Re: dkopp package copyright and license text Soren Stoutner
  • Re: dkopp package copyright and license text Francesco Poli
  • Re: dkopp package copyright and license text Michael Cornelison
• package dkopp new upstream version copyright Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported 肖盛文
  • Re: package dkopp new upstream version copyright Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported Sven Geuer
  • Re: package dkopp new upstream version copyright Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported Bastian Blank
  • Re: package dkopp new upstream version copyright Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported Sven Geuer
  • Re: package dkopp new upstream version copyright Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported atzlinux
  • Re: package dkopp new upstream version copyright Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported 肖盛文

• Earlier messages