Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:13:31PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> Various people believe the MPL to be non-free, but there's code under it >> in the main archive at the moment so it's unlikely that an upload would >> be rejected for that reason. Exhibit B basically says "You can't call it > > The code under it in the main archive is there under the claim that it's > currently in the process of being dual-licensed under the GPL, so it should > be very likely.
No, that's not even roughly true. Other packages that are MPLed include: mozilla-stumbleupon nqc tdom brickos openmcu mozilla-ldapsdk Portions of nail bonsai bugzilla pilot-syncmal t38modem malsync Possibly parts of firebird (no, not the Mozilla project) libsaxon-java zope-rdfgrabber lnpd This is based on the contents of their copyright files. Can we please stop this "The only code under the MPL is Mozilla" argument? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]