Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> * Matthew Palmer:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 03:08:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> * MJ Ray:
>>> 
>>> > Do you think that this licence does not require a developer
>>> > of a modified package (other than PHP) to lie by saying
>>> > "This product includes PHP software"?
>>> 
>>> Perhaps the PHP folks subscribe to the view that PHP scripts are
>>> derivative works of PHP.
>>
>> Ye ghods, I'd hope not.  That would be similar to believing that this
>> message is a derivative of the English Grammar manual I read in school.
>
> Or that all non-trivial Emacs Lisp code must be licensed under the
> GPL.  This position is not *that* unusual...

Not being unusual doesn't make it sensible or correct.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to