[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >As a reminder, I see this clause as non-free because it starts as a >name-change clause, but then goes beyond and forbids an entire class of >names for derived works (any name having "PHP" as a substring, minus >some exceptions). >This is overreaching, IMO, and makes the clause non-free, even when >applied to PHP itself. Exactly, which part of the DFSG you think would forbid this?
-- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
