On 1/7/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The obvious conclusion one would draw from this is that there are no > competitors to Linux or, at least, that all the existing ones are > quickly being killed off. However, a quick examination of reality shows > this not to be the case.
It doesn't have to be the case for an action under 16 of the Clayton Act for threatened harm caused by violation of 1 of the Sherman Act to succeed. > > Every mention of a "uncharged co-conspirator" is hillarious as well. Perhaps because you don't understand what it means as well. It means uncharged parties which entered into GPL agreement and performed accordingly. regards, alexander.
