On 1/14/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/15/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/14/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We should start a "betting pool"[0] on when Wallace v. FSF will be > > > dismissed (again). > > > > I bet EURO 50 (through PayPal) that the FSF is going to lose it > > once again and won't get dismissal with prejudice through that > > motion. > > > > Who's playing? > > > > > The winner, of course, gets nothing but recognition > > > of being the winner :-D > > > > > > [0] Not really betting as nothing of value would be involved. > > > > Nah, that's for kids. > > Out in Australia you have to have a licence to do that.
Do you really need a permission from state to bet against someone across the ocean? It's not the same as setting up a casino or something like that. regards, alexander.
