On 26 Jan 2006 11:07:02 -0500, Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yorick Cool writes: > > And for others it might change the rules in a non-costly way or not at > > all. > > Thus it is a form of discrimination. It imposes costs (conditional, > but still costs) on some people that it does not impose on others.
Even free licenses discriminate against those who violate the license. For example, people have argued that since the GPL discriminates it's a non-free license. Discrimination alone isn't sufficient to make a license non-free. There has to be something about using the software freely that the license discriminates against for discrimination to make the software non-free. -- Raul
