On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 10:35:44AM -0500, Jeremy Hankins wrote: > We could, but does the DFSG require it?
This is backtracking the discussion: we've already been over this. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > There are other, non-malicious > reasons for choice-of-venue, as others have pointed out. There are non-malicious reasons for releasing software under completely proprietary licenses. Good intentions don't make a restriction more free. > Ah. I assumed (perhaps erroneously) that the choice of venue impacted > the choice of law. I take it that the two issues are unrelated? I believe choice of law is uncontroversially considered DFSG-free, as long as that choice of law doesn't actually cause the terms of the license to become non-free. -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
