On Friday 27 January 2006 20:29, Michael Poole wrote: > There's little or no evidence that requiring creators of a derivative > of some software to identify themselves would prevent a free use of > the software. Does that mean the Dissident test is irrelevant?
Yeah, since the dissident test has nothing do to with the DFSG, except by quite a big a stretch of the imagination. Not to say it's not a valuable thought experiment in some cases, but it sure isn't the great canonical test that some people here seem to think it is. -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
pgpK0TpmXV6BB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
