olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy Hankins wrote: > > olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > >>Let's conclude we do not agree. I respect your opinion but I invite > >>you to respect mine. > > > > > > Note that this is exactly the opposite of what I've taken to be your > > central thesis: that having multiple points of view damages the free > > software community. I've already explained why I disagree with this, so > > I wont do so again. But you might be interested in looking back through > > the archives for discussions with and about OSI and the OSD. I think > > those discussions covered much of the same ground. > > > When I say that I respect the opinion of someone else; it does not mean > that I agree with it. I was just upset to read from the previous post > (which was not yours) that "everyone with a straight face" must disagree > with me (about the freeness of the GFDL); while the opinion I defend is > just the opinion of the FSF, the creator of the word "free software".
You do realize that even the FSF does not think that the GFDL is a free license? They just don't think that freedom is as important for documentation as in software. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
