Raul Miller writes: > On 17 Mar 2006 14:58:12 -0500, Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Raul Miller writes: > > > Put differently: the GFDL does not extend the scope of copyright > > > law. Thus, it can not be taken to apply where copyright law does > > > not apply. > > > > Can you elaborate on where exactly copyright law no longer applies? > > A potential infinity of examples exist.
I thought it was rather obvious that I meant that in the sense of the original scenario, and not in the general case. You claim that the GFDL "can not be taken to apply where copyright law does not apply". Ignoring for the moment that copyleft by necessity goes beyond what is governed by copyright law, where in the scenario that I described does copyright law no longer apply to dealing with the work? Michael Poole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
