|--==> Javier Serrano Polo writes: JSP> En/na Free Ekanayaka ha escrit: JSP> I should warn you. You won't be the first one trying this. Others have JSP> already failed, including me. >> >>It sounds rather scaring :(
JSP> Considering the guy who was making the Ubuntu package failed, I don't JSP> think you're gonna do better. I don't feel very confident as far as legal matters are concerned, but maybe Daniel James, who has already dealt with other audio/multimedia related legal issues may help us (I'm keeping him in Cc). Daniel, please refer to the beginning of this thread http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/09/msg00032.html to get the whole story. >>Is dssi-vst equivalent to fst in terms of number of working VST >>plugins and stability? JSP> You should read its README, it shows good and bad points. I'm not a JSP> dssi-vst user but I know it has its author's blessing to be distributed JSP> (concerning binaries). And I can't test fst since I can't build it JSP> (sorry, I won't use that binary package). JSP> Have you thought about packaging an installer? No, but sounds as a good idea to me. What would the install do exactly in your opinion? JSP> I see FST is a C project. I could adapt the header to work with C but JSP> that'll have to wait. >> >>That would be good.. JSP> Mmmm, I've had a look at FST source. It needs more work than I expected. JSP> Unlike those other projects, FST needs tweaking and I'm afraid there's JSP> still more research to do. JSP> It won't be easy. You'll need: JSP> - Upstream to cooperate. Otherwise, you'll have to keep the changes. JSP> - Help from someone not bound to Steinberg's license to extend the JSP> header (I've already achieved my goal, so not interested). I see, looks a bit laborious but promising. Please let me know if you go further this way. Ciao, Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
