MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I noticed that bug #384019 has been recently closed. [...] > > The bug was closed because an FTP-master (James Troup) stated that the > > Open Publication License v1.0 without options is fine for main. [...] > > What should be done, in your opinion? > > Should the bug be reopened? > > No. I think the outer-surfaces problem is just an obnoxious advertising > clause, it seems unlikely that this particular licensor will try > to enforce 'identified' in a bad way and upstream tracking is OK.
I am confused as to whether the licensor will allow anonymous changes. On the one hand, he says At the same time I think anonymous changes to code or docs should indeed be disallowed. but on the other, he says The solution is to use a fantasy name for the author. Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
